Head-to-head · Qwen2.5-Coder
Qwen2.5 Coder 14B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B
Qwen2.5 Coder 14B needs ~10.1 GB at Q4_K_M; Qwen2.5 Coder 32B needs ~20.7 GB. That ~10.6 GB gap decides which hardware runs each; they differ on 4 of the 14 devices below.
Which devices run each
A representative spread across the memory range. Tap a verdict for the full breakdown.
Size at each quantization
* derived from bits-per-weight; unstarred sizes are measured GGUF files.
Bottom line
The larger Qwen2.5 Coder 32B needs ~20.7 GB; Qwen2.5 Coder 14B runs on lighter hardware at ~10.1 GB with more headroom and faster responses. Check each against your exact device: what runs Qwen2.5 Coder 14B · what runs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B.
More Qwen2.5-Coder comparisons
- Qwen2.5 Coder 0.5B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 14B
- Qwen2.5 Coder 0.5B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B
- Qwen2.5 Coder 1.5B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 14B
- Qwen2.5 Coder 1.5B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B
- Qwen2.5 Coder 3B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 14B
- Qwen2.5 Coder 3B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B
- Qwen2.5 Coder 7B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 14B
- Qwen2.5 Coder 7B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B
FAQ
What is the difference in memory between Qwen2.5 Coder 14B and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B?
At Q4_K_M, Qwen2.5 Coder 14B needs about 10.1 GB and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B needs about 20.7 GB, a difference of ~10.6 GB.
Should I run Qwen2.5 Coder 14B or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B?
Run Qwen2.5 Coder 32B if your hardware has the ~20.7 GB it needs and you want maximum quality; run Qwen2.5 Coder 14B (~10.1 GB) for lighter hardware, faster responses, and more memory headroom.
Full breakdowns: Qwen2.5 Coder 14B · Qwen2.5 Coder 32B · all models × devices.
Sources
Memory figures are estimates at Q4_K_M, validated 2026-08-03. See methodology.