Head-to-head · Nemotron
Nemotron Nano 9B v2 vs Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1
Nemotron Nano 9B v2 needs ~7.6 GB at Q4_K_M; Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1 needs ~30.6 GB. That ~23 GB gap decides which hardware runs each; they differ on 7 of the 14 devices below.
Which devices run each
A representative spread across the memory range. Tap a verdict for the full breakdown.
Size at each quantization
* derived from bits-per-weight; unstarred sizes are measured GGUF files.
Bottom line
The larger Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1 needs ~30.6 GB; Nemotron Nano 9B v2 runs on lighter hardware at ~7.6 GB with more headroom and faster responses. Check each against your exact device: what runs Nemotron Nano 9B v2 · what runs Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.
FAQ
What is the difference in memory between Nemotron Nano 9B v2 and Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1?
At Q4_K_M, Nemotron Nano 9B v2 needs about 7.6 GB and Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1 needs about 30.6 GB, a difference of ~23 GB.
Should I run Nemotron Nano 9B v2 or Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1?
Run Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1 if your hardware has the ~30.6 GB it needs and you want maximum quality; run Nemotron Nano 9B v2 (~7.6 GB) for lighter hardware, faster responses, and more memory headroom.
Full breakdowns: Nemotron Nano 9B v2 · Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1 · all models × devices.
Sources
- huggingface.co/bartowski/nvidia_Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1-GGUF
- huggingface.co/bartowski/nvidia_NVIDIA-Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2-GGUF
- huggingface.co/nvidia/Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1
- huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2
- huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2/discussions
- ollama.com/library/nemotron
- ollama.com/library/nemotron-3-nano
Memory figures are estimates at Q4_K_M, validated 2026-08-03. See methodology.