text model · Ornith · Windows
Can I run Ornith 1.0 35B on AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX (24GB)?
No. Ornith 1.0 35B needs ~23.2 GB even at Q4_K_M, but AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX (24GB) only has ~23 GB usable.
Needs ~23.2 GB even at Q4_K_M, but only ~23 GB is usable.
That figure is at a 4k context and moves about ±15% as context length changes.
The gap is about 0.2 GB: Ornith 1.0 35B needs roughly 23.2 GB at Q4_K_M and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX (24GB) leaves only about 23 GB usable for a model. The lightest tracked hardware that runs Ornith 1.0 35B is the Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 (32GB) at 32 GB. See Ornith 1.0 35B on Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 (32GB).
- Q4_K_M needed
- ~23.2 GB
- Usable on device
- ~23 GB
- Device memory
- 24 GB
Which quant fits
- Parameters
- 35B (MoE, 3B active)
- Q4_K_M size
- 21 GB
- Q8_0 size
- 37 GB
- Context
- 256k
- Ollama tag
- ornith:35b
- Memory
- 24 GB vram
- Usable for weights
- ~23 GB
- Power draw
- ~355 W
- Best runtime
- Ollama (ROCm) / llama.cpp ROCm (Linux)
What you can run instead
Run Ornith 1.0 35B on other hardware
FAQ
Can AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX (24GB) run Ornith 1.0 35B?
No. Ornith 1.0 35B needs ~23.2 GB even at Q4_K_M, but AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX (24GB) only has ~23 GB usable.
How much memory does Ornith 1.0 35B need?
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX (24GB) does not have enough memory. At Q4_K_M the weights are ~21 GB; with KV cache and runtime overhead, budget ~23.2 GB at a 4k context. It is a Mixture-of-Experts model (35B total / 3B active), so all experts must stay in memory; memory tracks total params, not active params.
What is the best tool to run Ornith 1.0 35B on Windows?
LM Studio for a simple setup; Ollama (CUDA) for the most speed. AMD GPUs run via Vulkan/ROCm at roughly half CUDA throughput. NVIDIA is the smooth path on Windows.
Embed this
[](https://localmodel.run/can-i-run/ornith-1.0-35b/amd-rx-7900-xtx-24gb) Sources
Weights are measured from GGUF files; KV cache and overhead are computed, so totals can vary ~15% with context and runtime. Any tok/s is a bandwidth estimate. See methodology.