text model · Nemotron · Windows
Can I run Nemotron Nano 9B v2 on 16GB RAM Laptop (CPU/iGPU only)?
Yes. Nemotron Nano 9B v2 runs on 16GB RAM Laptop (CPU/iGPU only) at Q4_K_M (~7.6 GB of ~12 GB usable).
Runs at Q4_K_M using ~7.6 GB of ~12 GB usable. You have room for Q8_0 for higher quality.
That figure is at a 4k context and moves about ±15% as context length changes. 16GB RAM Laptop (CPU/iGPU only) leaves ~4.4 GB of headroom, room to step up to Q8_0 for higher quality.
- Q4_K_M needed
- ~7.6 GB
- Usable on device
- ~12 GB
- Device memory
- 16 GB
- Best quant
- Q4_K_M
Which quant fits
Running cost · estimate
- Power draw
- ~28 W
- Electricity / 1M tokens
- ~$0.17
- Pays for itself after
- ~2,273M tok
At ~$0.15/kWh and the estimated ~7 tok/s, a million generated tokens costs about $0.17 in electricity. Versus a hosted API at ~$0.5 per million tokens, the ~$750 16GB RAM Laptop (CPU/iGPU only) pays for itself after roughly 2,273 million tokens, so local hardware is mostly a fixed cost, not a per-token one. TDP is the peak draw, so this is an upper bound. Assumptions.
Run it
Pick your tool. All 2 load the same Q4_K_M weights.
llama-cli -hf bartowski/nvidia_NVIDIA-Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2-GGUF:Q4_K_M lms get bartowski/nvidia_NVIDIA-Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2-GGUF How to run it
On Windows use LM Studio (Best GUI on Windows, auto-detects CUDA/Vulkan backends.).
- Parameters
- 9B
- Q4_K_M size
- 6.08 GB
- Q8_0 size
- 8.81 GB
- Context
- 128k
- Memory
- 16 GB ram
- Usable for weights
- ~12 GB
- Power draw
- ~28 W
- Best runtime
- Ollama (llama.cpp backend)
You could also run
Run Nemotron Nano 9B v2 on other hardware
FAQ
Can 16GB RAM Laptop (CPU/iGPU only) run Nemotron Nano 9B v2?
Yes. Nemotron Nano 9B v2 runs on 16GB RAM Laptop (CPU/iGPU only) at Q4_K_M (~7.6 GB of ~12 GB usable).
How much memory does Nemotron Nano 9B v2 need?
16GB RAM Laptop (CPU/iGPU only) has room to spare. At Q4_K_M the weights are ~6.08 GB; with KV cache and runtime overhead, budget ~7.6 GB at a 4k context.
What is the best tool to run Nemotron Nano 9B v2 on Windows?
LM Studio for a simple setup; Ollama (CUDA) for the most speed. AMD GPUs run via Vulkan/ROCm at roughly half CUDA throughput. NVIDIA is the smooth path on Windows.
Embed this
[](https://localmodel.run/can-i-run/nemotron-nano-9b/laptop-16gb) Sources
- en.wikipedia.org
- huggingface.co/bartowski/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-GGUF
- huggingface.co/bartowski/nvidia_NVIDIA-Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2-GGUF
- huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2
- huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2/discussions
- lmstudio.ai
- notebookcheck.net
- ollama.com
- ollama.com/library/llama3.1:8b
- ollama.com/library/mistral:7b
- ollama.com/library/nemotron-3-nano
- pcworld.com
- techpowerup.com
Weights are measured from GGUF files; KV cache and overhead are computed, so totals can vary ~15% with context and runtime. Any tok/s is a bandwidth estimate. See methodology.