text model · Llama · Windows
Can I run Llama 3.1 8B on 8GB RAM Laptop (CPU/iGPU only)?
No. Llama 3.1 8B needs ~6.4 GB even at Q4_K_M, but 8GB RAM Laptop (CPU/iGPU only) only has ~5 GB usable.
Needs ~6.4 GB even at Q4_K_M, but only ~5 GB is usable.
That figure is at a 4k context and moves about ±15% as context length changes.
The gap is about 1.4 GB: Llama 3.1 8B needs roughly 6.4 GB at Q4_K_M and 8GB RAM Laptop (CPU/iGPU only) leaves only about 5 GB usable for a model. The lightest tracked hardware that runs Llama 3.1 8B is the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 (12GB) at 12 GB. See Llama 3.1 8B on Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 (12GB).
- Q4_K_M needed
- ~6.4 GB
- Usable on device
- ~5 GB
- Device memory
- 8 GB
Which quant fits
- Parameters
- 8B
- Q4_K_M size
- 4.92 GB
- Q8_0 size
- 8.54 GB
- Context
- 128k
- Ollama tag
- llama3.1:8b
- Memory
- 8 GB ram
- Usable for weights
- ~5 GB
- Power draw
- ~15 W
- Best runtime
- Ollama (llama.cpp backend)
What you can run instead
Run Llama 3.1 8B on other hardware
FAQ
Can 8GB RAM Laptop (CPU/iGPU only) run Llama 3.1 8B?
No. Llama 3.1 8B needs ~6.4 GB even at Q4_K_M, but 8GB RAM Laptop (CPU/iGPU only) only has ~5 GB usable.
How much memory does Llama 3.1 8B need?
8GB RAM Laptop (CPU/iGPU only) does not have enough memory. At Q4_K_M the weights are ~4.92 GB; with KV cache and runtime overhead, budget ~6.4 GB at a 4k context.
What is the best tool to run Llama 3.1 8B on Windows?
LM Studio for a simple setup; Ollama (CUDA) for the most speed. AMD GPUs run via Vulkan/ROCm at roughly half CUDA throughput. NVIDIA is the smooth path on Windows.
Embed this
[](https://localmodel.run/can-i-run/llama-3.1-8b/laptop-8gb) Sources
- amazon.com
- en.wikipedia.org
- gorilla.cs.berkeley.edu
- huggingface.co/bartowski/Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct-GGUF
- huggingface.co/bartowski/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-GGUF
- lmarena.ai
- lmstudio.ai
- notebookcheck.net
- ollama.com
- ollama.com/library/llama3.1
- ollama.com/library/llama3.1/tags
- ollama.com/library/llama3.2:1b
- ollama.com/library/phi3:mini
- store.acer.com
Weights are measured from GGUF files; KV cache and overhead are computed, so totals can vary ~15% with context and runtime. Any tok/s is a bandwidth estimate. See methodology.