text model · GLM · macOS
Can I run GLM-4.7-Flash on Apple M2 (16GB)?
No. GLM-4.7-Flash needs ~19.2 GB even at Q4_K_M, but Apple M2 (16GB) only has ~10.5 GB usable.
Needs ~19.2 GB even at Q4_K_M, but only ~10.5 GB is usable.
That figure is at a 4k context and moves about ±15% as context length changes.
The gap is about 8.7 GB: GLM-4.7-Flash needs roughly 19.2 GB at Q4_K_M and Apple M2 (16GB) leaves only about 10.5 GB usable for a model. The lightest tracked hardware that runs GLM-4.7-Flash is the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 (24GB) at 24 GB. See GLM-4.7-Flash on Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 (24GB).
- Q4_K_M needed
- ~19.2 GB
- Usable on device
- ~10.5 GB
- Device memory
- 16 GB
Which quant fits
- Parameters
- 30B (MoE, 3B active)
- Q4_K_M size
- 17.05 GB
- Q8_0 size
- 29.66 GB
- Context
- 200k
- Ollama tag
- glm-4.7-flash:latest
- Memory
- 16 GB unified
- Usable for weights
- ~10.5 GB
- Power draw
- ~50 W
- Best runtime
- Ollama (llama.cpp Metal backend) / MLX
What you can run instead
Run GLM-4.7-Flash on other hardware
FAQ
Can Apple M2 (16GB) run GLM-4.7-Flash?
No. GLM-4.7-Flash needs ~19.2 GB even at Q4_K_M, but Apple M2 (16GB) only has ~10.5 GB usable.
How much memory does GLM-4.7-Flash need?
Apple M2 (16GB) does not have enough memory. At Q4_K_M the weights are ~17.05 GB; with KV cache and runtime overhead, budget ~19.2 GB at a 4k context. It is a Mixture-of-Experts model (30B total / 3B active), so all experts must stay in memory; memory tracks total params, not active params.
What is the best tool to run GLM-4.7-Flash on macOS?
LM Studio for a simple setup; mlx-lm for the most speed. vLLM is NOT a Mac tool, it is a CUDA/Linux serving engine. Unified memory is not a fixed VRAM slice; ~70% is usable for weights.
Embed this
[](https://localmodel.run/can-i-run/glm-4.7-flash/apple-m2-16gb) Sources
Weights are measured from GGUF files; KV cache and overhead are computed, so totals can vary ~15% with context and runtime. Any tok/s is a bandwidth estimate. See methodology.